Why the Climate Crisis is a Scam
Updated 11 October, 2025 Something to get straight from the outset: Questioning the legitimacy of existing climate narratives does not make one selfish or reckless. There are many variables at play, and to ignore them can empower a very parasitic few while disempowering and in some cases destroy the many. The section below is a summary from Clintel.org – an organisation that has gathered over 2000 signatures of scientists and professionals who declare that there is no climate emergency – just a manipulation of facts. The page can be accessed here. Overview Concerns Calls for debate The 5 factors below are a good starting point in rebuttal against the “climate change is an imminent threat” argument that is posed by mainstream narratives. 1. Natural as well as anthropogenic factors cause warming The geological archive reveals that Earth’s climate has varied as long as earth has existed, with natural cold and warm phases. The Little Ice Age ended as recently as 1850. Therefore, it is no surprise that we now are experiencing a period of warming. 2. Warming is far slower than predicted The world has warmed significantly less than predicted by IPCC on the basis of modeled anthropogenic forcing. The gap between the real world and the modeled world tells us that we are far from understanding climate change. 3. Climate policy relies on inadequate models Climate models have many shortcomings and are not remotely plausible as global policy tools. They blow up the effect of greenhouse gases such as CO2. In addition, they ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with CO2 is beneficial. 4. CO2 is plant food, the basis of all life on Earth CO2 is not a pollutant. It is essential to all life on Earth. Photosynthesis is a blessing. More CO2 is beneficial for nature, greening the Earth: additional CO2 in the air has promoted growth in global plant biomass. It is also good for agriculture, increasing the yields of crops worldwide. 5. Global warming has not increased natural disasters There is no statistical evidence that global warming is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent. However, there is ample evidence that CO2-mitigation measures are as damaging as they are costly. To believe the outcome of a climate model is to believe what the model makers have put in. This is precisely the problem of today’s climate discussion to which climate models are central. Climate science has degenerated into a discussion based on beliefs, not on sound self-critical science. Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific. In particular, scientists should emphasize that their modeling output is not the result of magic: computer models are human-made. What comes out is fully dependent on what theoreticians and programmers have put in: hypotheses, assumptions, relationships, parameterizations, stability constraints, etc. Unfortunately, in mainstream climate science most of this input is undeclared. The World Climate Declaration (WCD) has brought a large variety of competent scientists together from all over the world. The considerable knowledge and experience of this group is indispensable in reaching a balanced, dispassionate and competent view of climate change. Find a .pdf of their declaration and signatures here. Why have their positions on climate change been banished from the corporate mainstream information sharers? What are the conflicts of interests and who benefits from climate change policy? * It is not the number of experts but the quality of arguments that counts The message you’ll hear from climate alarmists If we have to summarise IPCC reports in one paragraph, it might sound like this: Current warming is unprecedented in at least 125,000 years and the current CO2 concentration is unprecedented in at least two million years. CO2 and other greenhouse gases have caused all or most of the warming since 1850. As a result, some changes, like sea level rise, are already irreversible for centuries to come. Climate change is already making the weather more extreme. Around half of the global population is very vulnerable to climate change. Only urgent climate action, i.e., reducing CO2, and other greenhouse gases, can secure a liveable future for all. Luckily, renewable energy has become much cheaper in the past decade, so we can do it. An even shorter summary would look like this: The current warming is unprecedented, is caused by us, is very dangerous, and we should stop it by reducing our CO2 emissions, preferably by enhancing the production of renewable energy. PROBLEM None of this is accurate. Please see the video below for more context. Breaking down the climate crisis deception, point by point. The Suspicion: New Zealand’s Government, Corporate News Media, and Corporate Industry Leaders, are pushing a narrative that man made carbon dioxide emissions are the primary cause of an existential climate threat to humanity. Data: Carbon Dioxide accounts for 0.04% of the earth’s atmosphere. Human caused carbon dioxide accounts for a heavily debated range of between 5 to 35% of total Atmospheric C02. New Zealand accounts for 0.09% of the world’s carbon dioxide (C02) emissions. SUMMARY OF NZ’s WORLDWIDE C02 EMISSIONS: New Zealand accounts for 0.09 % of 5-35% of 0.04% of Worldwide Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere. Questions: Why is there so much urgency towards reducing man made C02 emissions in New Zealand if New Zealand accounts for less than 1/10,000th of a percent of total CO2 emissions? Who benefits the most (profits the most, gains the most power/influence) if New Zealand adopts a C02 reducing strategy. Why are fact checkers biased and why is there no open and balanced public debate? What are the risks and costs of implementing policies and strategies aimed at reducing C02? Why is New Zealand’s corporate media not pointing any of this out? How much are New Zealanders currently paying in taxes and other expenses towards Net ZERO climate policy decisions in New Zealand? What other sacrifices will New Zealanders be asked / forced to make in order to meet these (completely unnecessary) Net Zero goals?
Top 10 reasons Covid-19 is a Scam
COVID-19 was a Scam (bullet points) Suspicion: New Zealand’s Government, Corporate News Media, and Commercial Enterprises of Influence, collaborated in pushing a false pandemic for the purposes of a political agenda aimed at controlling populations with far greater surveillance. COVID-19 is one excuse to allow for that extra scrutiny. This is a living web page, meaning that as more up to date and / or reliable information comes through – it will be added to the page and unclear or inaccurate information will be taken down. 100% accuracy is not promised, but over time best efforts are being made to achieve as much accuracy and clarity as possible. ARGUMENT POINTS THAT COVID-19 IS A SCAM: COVID-19 Biometric Tests were patented in 2017, by Richard Rothschild. ->> Question: How could it have been known in 2017 that there would be a pandemic declared in 2019 exactly named COVID-19? Is this not more than a coincidence? On October 18, 2019, the John Hopkins Center for health security, in partnership with The World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, hosted a multi-million dollar exercise simulating a public response strategy to a worldwide pandemic. ->> Question: How much of a coincidence is it to host an exercise of this nature just months before an ACTUAL pandemic was declared, the first such pandemic with at least 1 million deaths recorded since 1968? The World Economic Forum and The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation were to become key authorities and benefactors of the COVID-19 pandemic, through powers granted and Financial Benefits received. ->> Question: Is it not a massive coincidence that the very people who gained power and wealth from the pandemic were also principal promoters of Event 201 preceding the declared pandemic?
Was COVID-19 a Scam?
Return to Government Sponsored Harm Page LATEST UPDATE, 22 MAY 2025 There are a number of factors around COVID-19 that place its legitimacy under serious question. How much were mainstream media paid by organisations connected to pushing the pandemic narrative? What political and financial connections did New Zealand politicians and health bureaucrats have with the likes of the World Health Organisation, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Pfizer, and the International Monetary Fund? How much were doctors and medical outlets paid to inject New Zealanders with the COVID Vaccine? Was it isolated and defined and proven to be the cause of adverse health effects and even death? Elaboration: Current Situation: New Zealand Food Safety, under the authority of the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) and in collaboration with Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ), is proposing to adjust the MRL for glyphosate in specific food products. Proposed Increase: The proposal aims to increase the allowable levels of glyphosate residues in wheat, barley, oats, and dry field peas. Concerns and Justification: The increase in MRL is being proposed based on the use of glyphosate as a pre-harvest desiccant on crops like wheat, oats, barley, and peas. This practice can speed up drying, but it also results in higher glyphosate residues in the final products. Public Consultation: Organics Aotearoa New Zealand is urging people to submit their opinions on the proposed changes to the MRL. Safety Assessment:New Zealand Food Safety has previously stated that it aligns with the conclusions of the Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization (JMPR) reports, which have assessed glyphosate’s dietary risk as very low, according to the Ministry for Primary Industries.
NZ Government want to increase allowed Glyphosate levels
Return to Previous Page LATEST UPDATE, 15 MAY 2025 New Zealand Food Safety is considering raising the maximum residue level (MRL) for glyphosate in certain foods, particularly grains and peas. The proposal is to increase the MRL from the current default of 0.1 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg for wheat, barley, and oats, and 6 mg/kg for dry field peas, according to Farmers Weekly and Organics Aotearoa New Zealand. Glyphosate is a herbicide used in agriculture, and its presence in food can raise concerns about potential health impacts and dietary exposure, according to the Ministry for Primary Industries. Elaboration: Current Situation: New Zealand Food Safety, under the authority of the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) and in collaboration with Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ), is proposing to adjust the MRL for glyphosate in specific food products. Proposed Increase: The proposal aims to increase the allowable levels of glyphosate residues in wheat, barley, oats, and dry field peas. Concerns and Justification: The increase in MRL is being proposed based on the use of glyphosate as a pre-harvest desiccant on crops like wheat, oats, barley, and peas. This practice can speed up drying, but it also results in higher glyphosate residues in the final products. Public Consultation: Organics Aotearoa New Zealand is urging people to submit their opinions on the proposed changes to the MRL. Safety Assessment:New Zealand Food Safety has previously stated that it aligns with the conclusions of the Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization (JMPR) reports, which have assessed glyphosate’s dietary risk as very low, according to the Ministry for Primary Industries.
Barry Young Trial
06 May, 2025 What’s going on? Ministry of Health whistleblower Barry Young is currently facing criminal charges related to the release of patient information connected to the Covid Vaccine Rollout beginning in 2021. His defence is that he was exercising his right as a whistleblower because to his judgment he viewed serious adverse effects of the COVID-19 Vaccine, while the Crown’s prosecution lies on the accusation that Barry released sensitive data that should not have been released. Where we stand: There is now ample evidence that the COVID-19 vaccine caused harm to large amounts of people, including death – as the New Zealand Government and Media remain largely silent while still encouraging New Zealanders to receive the Covid Injection. We see this as very suspicious behaviour from both Media and Government, and therefore we believe that the information Barry revealed deserves proper respect and investigation, rather than Barry himself. Furthermore, Barry anonymised the data that he released, meaning that no names of any patients were disclosed among his findings. We believe the Crown are endeavouring on a wild goose chase. What is strange? Mainstream Media have been eerily silent in their reporting of this case in recent months. Are they avoiding giving it publicity because they know they were in the wrong by going against Young? SOME IDEAS OF WHAT YOU CAN DO: Support Barry Young – Barry’s court appearances are a great opportunity to show support for someone who dared question the safety of the Covid Vaccine. By showing up to his court appearances in person, you are sending a message to the Crown that Barry does not stand alone, and that their decisions carry weight that will not go away any time soon. Push the message – Whether it is sign holding at supermarkets or on roadsides, by demonstrating that yes, the covid vaccine has caused damage and that despite this the Government and Media have largely ignored it, you are reaching into the subconscious minds of those kiwis out there who have held suspicions, but haven’t quite allowed themselves to fully embrace the idea. Bumper stickers – “Yes, the COVID Vaccine killed people” or “Yes, COVID-19 was indeed a Scam” are two types of stickers you can slap on the back of your car… or anywhere else you can creatively imagine. Facing two Crown prosecutors and new charges, Barry feels up against a rather unfair system. Please click the video link below for Barry’s read on the situation. Credit to John Ansell for the footage. Click HERE
Why we’re here
Why we’re here… Essentially… – We do not trust the Government (central and local) or the corporate news media – We believe Government works for interests outside of the New Zealand people – We believe both Labour and National are two sides of the same coin – We believe Government are purposefully increasing debt to expedite financial collapse – We believe the financial system is a scam and we believe they know it – We believe their goal is to institute a Digital ID linked financial system – We believe the public have a right to know how the Government is betraying them That is why we’re here One of our primary concerns is that New Zealand’s Corporate Media and Members of Parliament are working on behalf of Private Non-Governmental Organisations overseas who have goals that conflict with the wellbeing of New Zealanders. We believe that mainstream media have been captured by these NGO’s and are pushing their Agendas hard. We believe with that the goal of these agendas is control, and that their stated reasons such as ‘equality’, ‘safety’, and ‘protect the environment’ are purely deceptive. Using topics such as health crises, climate emergencies and identity politics to push their agenda, they are using these things to rally the support of citizens around the world to adopt their policies in the name of ‘safety’, ‘environmental protection’, and ‘equality’. Rather than allow for open public debate on these issues, Corporate Media and Government have adopted a strategy of avoiding that completely and attacking anyone who dares oppose or question it. For example, when face masks were encouraged during COVID-19, rather than ask “Do we even need them?”, New Zealand’s corporate media pushed a campaign of “What style mask are you going to wear?” and that immediately established the default narrative that masks were necessary, even though it was far from a clear cut answer. We are here because we are concerned for the present and future wellbeing of our families and communities. We do not trust New Zealand politicians and corporate journalists any more… This website is for anyone who has doubts and concerns about the Corporate Media & New Zealand Government, and are looking for alternative answers. Our coming together is merely a response to what we see as a very real threat against our collective future safety and well-being. Here’s the pathway to tyrannical power: Step 1 ✅ Install puppet politicians Step 2 ✅ Buy off the News Media Step 3 ✅ Manufacture crisis (e.g COVID) Step 4 In process of happening Collapse the economy Step 5 Development phase Install Digital ID ‘solution’ Weaponising the word ‘MISINFORMATION’ Since March the 26th 2020 (the first COVID lockdown), we have witnessed massively unjustified overreach and propaganda by the New Zealand Government and Corporate News Media, with much harm caused to New Zealanders as a result. There has been no concession that the lockdowns were wrong. No acknowledgement of guilt that they directly caused the cost of living crisis that exists today, among other social and economic problems Government are now taxing New Zealanders for. Instead, both the Government and Corporate News Media have brandished words such as “Conspiracy Theorist” and “Misinformation Spreaders” to discredit anyone who has dared called out their behaviour and motives. They have applied manipulation tactics and hidden vital information in order to avoid confronting their horrendous decision-making. They have attacked and attempted to take down anyone who has dared challenge their version of the ‘truth’ during Covid-19. Dr Sam Bailey, for example – made numerous videos during the pandemic highlighting the concern over mask efficiency, the covid vaccine, and the actual threat level of COVID-19 itself, and has since been proven correct yet still, faces a fine of $148,000 and other costs for ‘spreading misinformation’. This is simply unacceptable, from our point of view. If the Government genuinely had faith that they were the voice of truth – they would have opened up a balanced public televised platform for their best experts to debate Samantha Bailey and her team over their points of contention. The truth does not hide from questioning, and we believe the government took it’s preferred position of lockdowns and vaccine mandates because it fit with their political agenda, to disrupt the New Zealand economy, and expedite financial collapse for a digital ID system. The Justice System and Law Enforcement The Government appear to be anchored by a Justice system that re-enforces the State’s will via the written laws of Government, irrespective of how nonsensical or tyrannical those laws may be, backed by a corporate Police Force who are on hand to intimidate or arrest anyone who dares question government policy. COVID-19 illustrated the extent of this level of corruption and it is simply unacceptable. In other words, we believe there is no justice in our current justice system and we see no pathway to justice via the existing system. We see a Corporate News Media who have massively betrayed the New Zealand Public by continuing to hide important factual information, while incessantly spreading fear and nonsensical agendas, like the fraudulent COVID-19 scam, and the mightily harmful mRNA Vaccine campaign that came with it. WHAT WE WANT We want a free and open New Zealand where individuals are empowered to create and support one another without Government overreach inhibiting our ability to protect ourselves, our environment, and our loved ones around us. We do not want our wellbeing threatened by any Government’s malicious decision-making or any News Media’s intentional propaganda campaign. We want the New Zealand Government and Corporate News Media held to account for the damage they have caused in harming people and hiding information. We believe their actions since the rollout of COVID-19 have been very arguably criminal. We would encourage the New Zealand public to embrace the possibility that they have been betrayed mightily by the New Zealand Government and Corporate News Media for the sake of a worldwide political agenda. Our trust in them is their
Chris Hipkins illustrates how out of touch politicians can be
Chris Hipkins illustrates just how out of touch politicians can be Highlights: Chris Hipkins as Leader of the Opposition ( as of 30 June 2024) takes $200,444 after tax income per year. The poorest 50% of New Zealand take home $20,780 or less after taxes. MP’s also have a number of perks affording them subsidies and extra money during the year. Do we need politicians to benefit themselves if their ‘service’ isn’t improving the poorest 50% of the country. Links Allowances for NZ Politicians Income Tax Calculator Average Salary in New Zealand Wages by Profession Inequality Tower – Wealth Distribution in NZ, 2018
New Zealand IHR Amendments update
New Zealand’s IHR Amendment update Highlights: New Zealand Government rejected Article 59 of the IHR Amendments NZ Government DID NOT reject the Amendments New Zealand released their negotiation mandates in February, 2024. The mandates are concerning because they use the words ‘should’ instead of ‘must’ when it comes to things like upholding human rights A critical eye must be kept on the New Zealand government as they move into a decision making period over the IHR.